Legal Opinion

Opel v. McGrath

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 10, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CONGER, District Judge.

Cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A.

Plaintiff sues pursuant- to Section 9(a) of the Trading With the Enemy Act, 50 U.S.C. A.Appendix, § 9(a), to recover certain property vested by the Alien Property Custodian on September 21, 1942 pursuant to the Act. The property vested consists of 36,940 shares of stock of the Harvard Brewing Company of Lowell, Massachusetts.

In her complaint, plaintiff contends that (1) she was a nonhostile alien and (2) that she has a right, title and interest in the property vested and is the sole…

2Cases cited5 opinions

Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
Uebersee Finanz-Korporation, A.G. v. McGrath Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
Berson v. Blue Ridge Coal Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

A. Smith Bowman & Sons, Inc. v. Schenley Distillers, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1961