Rubens v. Bowers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
Certain defendants below, Frank S. Rubens and Electro Ultra-violet Corporation (hereinafter called Electro), appeal from a judgment of the District Court decreeing ■that they and Therapy Products Co. of America (hereinafter called Therapy) had infringed upon certain letters patent, and ordering that an injunction issue and that plaintiffs recover profits and damages from the named defendants. Therapy, having been adjudicated bankrupt prior to the filing of the Notice of Appeal, is not named as an appellant herein.
An application for a patent on a therapeutic light ray…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Littlefield v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Luckett v. Delpark, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- James G. Wilson v. George A. Sanford and Robert G. MusgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Hartell v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bowers v. E. J. Rose Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Aetna-Standard Engineering Co. v. RowlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Chaskin v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- H. M. Chase Corp. v. Idaho Potato Processors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
- James C. Wilborn & Sons, Inc., and Tilt Sash Corporation v. Brandex Tilt Sash, Inc., and Western Engineering TrustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967