Legal Opinion

Ferry v. Berger

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 23, 2021No. 3:18-cv-00154Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RICHARD FERRY, Civil No. 3:18-cv-00154-AC Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. STEVE BERGER, and MICHAEL HSU, Respondents. ACOSTA, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner brings this habeas corpus action challenging his 2010 conviction on several charges of sexual abuse against his two nieces. For the reasons that follow, the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 All parties to this action have consented to allow a Magistrate Judge to enter final orders and judgment in this case in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API