Legal Opinion
Graham v. Canadian National Railway Co.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided November 5, 1990No. Civ. A. 87-48PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
HOLDEN, Senior District Judge.
This action was commenced by Edward and Brigitte Graham and their daughters Elizabeth, Angelica and Jean to recover for personal injuries and property damages which they allege resulted from the application of herbicides by the defendant Canadian National Railway Company (CNR) along its right of way adjacent to the Graham home place. Edward Graham deceased in January 1990. The plaintiff Brigitte has been appointed the administratrix of his estate. Mrs. Graham has been substituted as the representative of the decedent,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Allen Peteet, Ann I. Greenhill, Individually and on Behalf of the Heirs of the Estate of James Edward Greenhill, Deceased v. Dow Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Langle v. KurkulSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Bonnie Lee Jamieson Deveny, B.N.F. Frank Jamieson, and Frank Jamieson v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, Robertshaw Fulton Controls CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cavallo v. Star EnterpriseDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- Lamb v. Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1993
- Blanchard v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, D. Vermont · 2002
- Rodrigue v. VALCO Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.