Legal Opinion

United States v. Godiksen

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 10, 2021No. 20-530Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

20-530 United States v. Godiksen UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Carluin SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. FarhaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Lai-Moi Leung and Seow Ming ChoonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API