Legal Opinion

Polarome Manufacturing Co. v. Commerce & Industry Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 23, 1998PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

CARCHMAN, J.S.C.

(temporarily assigned).

' This is an insurance coverage case the disposition of which is dependent on whether New York or New Jersey law applies. If New York law applies, plaintiffs failure to provide timely notice to the insurer warrants a dismissal of plaintiffs declaratory judgment action seeking coverage. Applying the choice-of-law analysis mandated by the Supreme Court in State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. Estate of Simmons, 84 N.J. 28, 417 A.2d 488 (1980), and The Gilbert Spruance Co. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Ass’n Ins. Co., 134…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Veazey v. DoremusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  4. Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  5. Gilbert Spruance Co. v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harrow Stores, Inc. v. Hanover Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  2. POLAROME MFG. COMPANY v. Commerce & Industry Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. Kenny v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  4. Vuarnet Footwear, Inc. v. Sea-Rail Services Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  5. JULIA MORENO VS. ILEANA LISSETH PULIDO MONTOYA (L-3240-13, L-3303-13 AND L-3327-13, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API