Legal Opinion
Solomon v. Dixon
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided September 5, 1989No. 88-589-CRTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
724 F.Supp. 1193 (1989)
Anthony Ray SOLOMON, Plaintiff,
v.
Gary T. DIXON, et al., Defendants.
No. 88-589-CRT.
United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division.
September 5, 1989.
Anthony Ray Solomon, pro se.
Lacy H. Thornburg, North Carolina Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, and Valerie L. Bateman, Associate Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N.C., for defendants.
ORDER
JAMES C. FOX, District Judge.
Plaintiff has instituted this Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the following defendants: Gene T. Cousins, Deputy Prison Warden at Central Prison; William E. Crump, a Correctional Sergeant; Gary T.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blue v. JabeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
- Robertson v. HuffmanDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2001
- Anthony Ray Solomon v. Gary T. Dixon Bobby R. Watson William E. Crump, Sergeant Homer M. Godfrey, Captain Carvin Strickland Bennie A. MacK Jr. George L. Jones Charlie C. Owens Gene T. CousinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990