Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Schorer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 11, 1935PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Feely, S.

Upon rejection of a timely presented, verified claim on an oral contract for services to this testator, the attorneys for the respective parties agreed that the matter should stand awhile, and when the executor was prepared to settle his accounts, this claim would be tried out before the surrogate. Aside from claimant’s attorney serving, with the claim, a notice of retainer and appearance, nothing further was done by either party until the time, over seven and a half years after the claim had accrued, when the claimant filed a petition to compel the executor to account. The latter…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Butler v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Rosa v. . ButterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Schutz v. . MoretteNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. W. S. Tyler Co. v. RebicOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Bucklin v. ChapinNew York Supreme Court · 1868

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. In re the Estate of WeinbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  3. In re the Estate of RosenblattNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. In re the Accounting of QuantNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
  5. In re the Estate of CoventryNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API