Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Coventry

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 30, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Feely, S.

Respondent moves to dismiss the petition to have this court reopen a decree of judicial settlement and to fix the amount of the legal services rendered by petitioner’s testator in the probate of the will and liquidation of the estate of the above-named testator. The grounds urged are that the petition, on its face, in the most favorable light to the petitioner, not only does not state a cause of action, but also does set out facts which show that the claim made therein is barred by the six-year Statute of Limitations,

i The facts alleged are that the petitioner’s testator, a local…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of SchorerNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. In re the Estate of AshheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  3. In re RabellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. In re the Estate of SchorerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. In re the Estate of JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CoventryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Tomten v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Tomten v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API