Legal Opinion
Point Contracting, LLC v. Urban Investment Research Corp. and West Roswell NM, LLC
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided March 31, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00562Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO POINT CONTRACTING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. No. 2:24-cv-00562-SMD-KRS URBAN INVESTMENT RESEARCH CORP. and WEST ROSWELL NM, LLC, Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Doc. 61 (“Pl.’s Mot. for SJ”). Defendants filed their response and Plaintiff replied. Doc. 63 (“Defs.’ Resp.”); Doc. 66 (“Pl.’s Reply”). Upon careful consideration of the record, relevant law, and the parties’ briefing, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reed v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Serna v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Continental Potash, Inc. v. Freeport-McMoran, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Paiz v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.