Legal Opinion
Haman v. City of Surrey
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1988No. Civ. 870049, 870050PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
The plaintiffs, as appellants, are landowners (Landowners) who challenge special assessments levied against their property. Landowners appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing their complaints against the city of Surrey et al. We affirm.
Landowners protest the special assessments for water and sewer improvements in Surrey, North Dakota. Surrey’s population is approximately 1,000. Landowners’ property is not developed for commercial or residential use, but lies within the limits of Surrey. Landowners’ property is 247 of approximately 640 acres within the limits…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Soo Line Railroad Company v. City of WiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Cloverdale Foods Co. v. City of MandanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Reed v. City of LangdonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Serenko v. City of WiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Ulvedal v. Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Hector v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Bateman v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Riverview Place, Inc. v. Cass County Ex Rel. Cass County Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.