Soo Line Railroad Company v. City of Wilton
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSON, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered for the Soo Line Railroad Company (hereinafter Railroad) by the District Court of McLean County, Clifford Jan-sonius, J., presiding. The City of Wilton (hereinafter City) has demanded a trial de novo in this court, pursuant to § 28-27- 32 of the North Dakota Century Code.
The facts are as follows: The governing body of the City of Wilton determined that a number of its streets should be paved and should have curbs and gutters installed. To facilitate this improvement, the city governing board created Street Improvement District 65-2 and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Geo. E. Haggart, Inc. v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Williams Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Shaw v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re the Annexation of a Part of Donnybrook Public School District No. 24North Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Appeal of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Barnes County v. Garrison Diversion Conservancy DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Triangle Oilfield Services, Inc. v. HagenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.