Legal Opinion

Soo Line Railroad Company v. City of Wilton

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1969No. Civ. 8547PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered for the Soo Line Railroad Company (hereinafter Railroad) by the District Court of McLean County, Clifford Jan-sonius, J., presiding. The City of Wilton (hereinafter City) has demanded a trial de novo in this court, pursuant to § 28-27- 32 of the North Dakota Century Code.

The facts are as follows: The governing body of the City of Wilton determined that a number of its streets should be paved and should have curbs and gutters installed. To facilitate this improvement, the city governing board created Street Improvement District 65-2 and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Geo. E. Haggart, Inc. v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Williams Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. City of CentervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Burleigh CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re the Annexation of a Part of Donnybrook Public School District No. 24North Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Appeal of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Barnes County v. Garrison Diversion Conservancy DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Triangle Oilfield Services, Inc. v. HagenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API