Legal Opinion
Lund v. Biesanz Stone Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 17, 1931No. 28,401PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission.
It is conceded that respondent was accidentally injured Avhile in the employ of the relator Biesanz Stone Company whereby he became entitled to compensation under the workmen’s compensation act. The accidental injury was received May 11, 1926. His weekly wage was $22.20. Since the injury respondent has received medical, surgical, and hospital benefits in the sum of $2,839.85 and has been paid weekly $14.80, amounting to $2,289.60 in all. But on June 4, 1929, relators on notice discontinued further payments. A hearing upon the right…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Globe Indemnity Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Hull v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1918
- Simpson v. New Jersey Stone & Tile Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Feldman v. BraunsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Bateman Manufacturing Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Reese v. Preston Marketing AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Mechling v. Jasper Stone CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Carmody v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Krnetich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.