Legal Opinion

United States v. Fattah

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 2016No. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 15-346PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Bartle, District Judge.

This action is the story of political corruption involving five criminal schemes. Following their convictions by a jury after a lengthy trial, the defendants have filed motions for judgments of acquittal under Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or in the alternative for a new trial under Rule 33.

Congressman Chaka Fattah, Sr., Herbert Vederman, Robert Brand, Karen Nicholas, and Bonnie Bowser were charged in a twenty-nine count indictment with conspiracy to commit racketeering (18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)) as well as an array of other crimes.1 The…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jin v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
  2. Miserendino v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
  3. United States v. BrandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. United States v. FattahDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. United States v. VedermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API