United States v. Fattah
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Bartle, District Judge.
This action is the story of political corruption involving five criminal schemes. Following their convictions by a jury after a lengthy trial, the defendants have filed motions for judgments of acquittal under Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or in the alternative for a new trial under Rule 33.
Congressman Chaka Fattah, Sr., Herbert Vederman, Robert Brand, Karen Nicholas, and Bonnie Bowser were charged in a twenty-nine count indictment with conspiracy to commit racketeering (18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)) as well as an array of other crimes.1 The…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jin v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Miserendino v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- United States v. BrandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- United States v. FattahDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- United States v. VedermanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016