Legal Opinion
United States v. Brand
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 20, 2016No. CRIMINAL ACTION NOS. 15-346-3, 15-346-4Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Bartle, Judge.
Before the court are the motions of defendants Robert Brand and Karen Nicholas, pursuant to the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3143, for bail pending appeal. The facts of this case are set forth in detail in the court’s Memorandum in support of its Order addressing post-trial motions. See generally United States v. Fattah, 223 F.Supp.3d 336, 2016 WL 7839022, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145833 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 20, 2016).
Defendants Robert Brand and Karen Nicholas were each found guilty by a jury of conspiracy to commit racketeering and conspiracy to commit wire fraud,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Stanton Miller and Robert MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Connie M. HandyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.