State v. Pobor
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment revoking his probationary sentence and imposing a 70-month prison term—the exact consequence that defendant had previously stipulated to—as a sanction for his probation violation. Despite having stipulated to that sanction, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in imposing a Measure 11-based probation sanction and argues that the court was limited to a sanction based on the felony sentencing guidelines. The state responds that we lack jurisdiction to consider defendant’s appeal under ORS 138.222(7)(b), which requires defendants to show “colorable” claims of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. KephartOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. SilsbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. OrcuttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. StubbsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.