Arents v. Casselman & Co.
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of tlie Circuit Court of Henrico county in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for the plaintiffs. assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This action of assumpsit was brought by the plaintiffs, Casselman & Company, to recover of the defendant, George Arents, commissions alleged to be due them upon a sale claimed to have been made by them, or through their instrumentality, of a farm belonging to the defendant. To a verdict and judgment for $900 in favor of the plaintiffs this writ of error was obtained by the defendant.
The record shows that on July 14, 1904, the real estate firm of Casselman & Co., composed of J. R. Hockaday and Laurence Casselman, were authorized in writing by Thomas F. Jeffress, agent for the defendant, to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ice v. MaxwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Richmond Traction Co. v. HildebrandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
3Cited by4 opinions
- Averill v. O'FarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
- Paschall & Gresham v. GillissSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
- Shea Realty Corp. v. Page & TaylorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
- Middle Atlantic Immigration Co. v. ArdanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913