Legal Opinion

Simon v. Foster

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1962No. 39574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This action was commenced by the defendants in error, hereafter referred to as plaintiffs, to quiet title to an oil lease upon certain lands' in Okmulgee County, Oklahoma.

By way of answer the defendant claimed a ½6⅛ of the %hs working interest as an override.

The facts are as follows: In the beginning the defendant and his co-adventurer, Shadid, owned the entire working interest in the oil lease covering the N% of SW54 and SEi/2 of SWj4 of Sec. 6, T 14N, R 1SE, containing 120 acres. The lease owners assigned to various parties an undivided ■%6ths interest in such working…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beatty v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Whitman v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Davis v. Keeche Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Edwards v. BrushaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. Anderson v. MaukSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roye Realty & Developing, Inc. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Roye Realty & Developing, Inc. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Apc Operating Partnership v. Dale G. MacKey and Evelyn C. MacKey and Darrell E. MacKey and Lovell H. MacKeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API