Legal Opinion

City of Harlingen v. Vega

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 10, 1997No. 13-97-027-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a motion for summary judgment. By three points of error, appellants complain that the trial court erred by denying their motion for summary judgment and by considering appellee’s summary judgment evidence over their objections. We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment.

Background

The parties agree on a limited number of facts. Following a minor hit-and-run accident in April 1995, Harlingen police officers Timoteo Flores and Matthew Charles Manning stopped Rosa…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. M.G.M. Grand Hotel, Inc. v. Castro, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  2. Scott v. Godwin, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  3. Hidalgo County v. Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  4. Rivera v. White, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
  5. Bexar County v. Giroux-Daniel, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API