Pignatel v. Mobley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1, 2. Under the facts of the case and the law pertinent thereto it clearly appears that the defendant was the real owner of the stock at the date of the bank’s failure, and the owner may be sued by the superintendent of banks although the' shares of the stock “stand on the books of the bank in the name of another who in fact has no interest therein.” Harris v. Taylor, 148 Ga. 663 (6) (98 S. E. 86); Doster v. Mobley, 38 Ga. App. 508 (2) (144 S. E. 385). “The method of collecting an assessment against a stockholder of an insolvent banking corporation by a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harris v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Doster v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Cozart v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Candler v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Freeman v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carolina Power & Light Co. v. IseleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Neely v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Brock v. GormleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Greenwood v. CochraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933