Armstrong v. Merts
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The contention of the plaintiff in error, that the Superior Court of Fulton County was without jurisdiction of the petition because no process was asked for or attached to the petition and it was not made returnable to any specific term of said court, can not be legally sustained. The petition alleged that the 20-day notice required by the Code, § 85-1506, was given to the parties at interest. “In applications for partition of ‘lands and tenements in this State the party applying for the writ of partition shall give to the other parties concerned at least…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People's National Bank v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Miller v. Harris CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Flemister v. FlemisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Walker v. HortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lowell v. BouchillonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Johnson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Leggitt v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Baggett v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004