Legal Opinion
Browne v. R. & R. ENGINEERING CO.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 21, 1958No. Civ. A. 1873PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAYTON, District Judge.
Jurisdiction here is based upon diversity of citizenship.
I find the following facts: Plaintiff, a registered engineer of eighteen years experience, is employed by Catalytic Construction Co. in Philadelphia. He is experienced in bidding on government contracts. Through his work at Catalytic, he learned that certain sub-contracts were about to be let through Swinerton & Walbert Co. for the Atomic Energy Commission which a small machine shop might hope successfully to bid on and complete. He had a friend named Weber, an engineer, who in conjunction with a partner,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Hazelton v. SheckellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Givens v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Mitchell v. Flintkote Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Deakyne v. Commissioners of LewesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- United States v. WebberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Edmund v. Browne v. R & R Engineering Co., a Corporation of the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Wolff v. CallaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.