Legal Opinion

Gitler v. Ohio

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided July 6, 2009No. Case 3:08CV2618PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES G. CARR, Chief Judge.

This is a frivolous suit by a pro se plaintiff. Plaintiff, Pat Gitler, sued the defendants, Attorney General of Ohio, United States Attorney, and United States Attorney General [collectively “the Government”] alleging meritless claims arising from a well on her property.

Pending is my show cause order as to why I should not impose sanctions under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. [Doc. 23]. For the following reasons, I sanction Gitler $2,000.

Background

On November 6, 2008, Gitler filed this case in federal court alleging multiple claims from negligence to mail fraud. I dismissed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Jones v. Continental Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. Andersons, Inc. v. Consol, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cassandra R. Wiltz, et al. v. Dave Yost, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
  2. Lipin v. WisehartDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
  3. Monsieur Shawnellias Burgess v. Doji, Inc. et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
  4. Owen W. Barnaby v. Michigan State Government, et al.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2025
  5. Powers v. Charles River Laboratories, IncorporatedDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API