Howard v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARY K. HOFF, Judge.
Kenneth Howard (Movant) appeals the motion court’s denial, without an evidentia-ry hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. Movant first claims the motion court erred because Movant’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call him to testify on his own behalf. In his second point, Movant claims the motion court erred because Movant’s appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise a discovery violation issue that was properly preserved. We reverse and remand in part and affirm in part.
A jury convicted Movant of second degree (felony)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
- State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Coates v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hurst v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Morrison v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Stewart v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Evans v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.