LeChien v. St. Louis Concessions, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRANDALL, Judge.
Proposed intervenor, Thomas A. Le-Chien (hereinafter “intervenor”), appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to intervene in an action on a promissory note between plaintiff, A.G. Enterprises, Inc., and defendants, St. Louis Concessions, Inc. and Floyd C. Warmann, after the court entered summary judgment in favor of defendants in the underlying action. We affirm.
In 1993, plaintiff brought the underlying action against defendants, seeking to collect on a promissory note executed by defendants in the amount of $2.4 million plus interest. The note provided for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ballmer v. BallmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Augspurger v. MFA Oil Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Farmers State Bank v. Place-Wiederholt Chevrolet-Oldsmobile, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Maries County Bank v. HoertelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Clarkson Kehrs Mill Transp. Dev.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Myers v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Stockman v. Safe-Skin, Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Behymer v. City of BallwinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Griffitts v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.