Legal Opinion

Augspurger v. MFA Oil Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1997No. Nos. WD 52140, WD 52196PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

The issues in this case are whether Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”), an excess insurer which has denied coverage to certain defendants in tort litigation, is nevertheless entitled to (1) stay the litigation pending another court’s decision on whether Federal’s excess policy provided coverage for the underlying occurrence, or to (2) intervene as a matter of right in the litigation. This court holds that the trial court properly denied both the motion to stay and the petitions to intervene.

This case arose out of a December 25, 1992, incident in which four persons died, three…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. Lakeside Hospital Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Ballmer v. BallmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State Ex Rel. Rimco, Inc. v. DowdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Estate of Langhorn v. LawsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. Albert v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  3. Borgard v. Integrated National Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. LeChien v. St. Louis Concessions, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Flippin v. Coleman Trucking, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API