Legal Opinion

State v. Mueller

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1983No. 8732PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*618OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

The Supreme Court teaches us “that a right to personal privacy, or a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy,” is implicit in the United States Constitution, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 152 (1973); Article I, Section 6 of the Hawaii Constitution explicitly declares that “[t]he right of the people to privacy is recognized and shall not be infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest.” Defendant-appellant Lauren Mueller (the defendant) claims the State invaded a constitutionally protected area of privacy when it prosecuted her for…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. MallanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  4. McCloskey v. Honolulu Police DepartmentHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. GrahamHawaii Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API