State v. Mueller
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*618OPINION OF THE COURT BY
NAKAMURA, J.
The Supreme Court teaches us “that a right to personal privacy, or a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy,” is implicit in the United States Constitution, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 152 (1973); Article I, Section 6 of the Hawaii Constitution explicitly declares that “[t]he right of the people to privacy is recognized and shall not be infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest.” Defendant-appellant Lauren Mueller (the defendant) claims the State invaded a constitutionally protected area of privacy when it prosecuted her for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. MallanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- McCloskey v. Honolulu Police DepartmentHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GrahamHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.