McCloskey v. Honolulu Police Department
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, CJ.
This court is called upon to decide whether the drug testing program of the Honolulu Police Department (HPD) violates the Hawaii Constitution. We conclude that neither the right to privacy of article I, section 6 nor the right to be free of unreasonable searches of article I, section 7 is infringed upon by. the HPD’s program of urine testing.
I
Plaintiff-Appellant Shanda McCloskey (Appellant) has been a police officer since October 1984, assigned to the patrol division. Before being hired, she submitted to ah extensive investigation of her personal background and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- New Jersey Transit PBA Local 304 v. New Jersey Transit Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- State v. HeapyHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'n v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Harris v. DeSotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Doe v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.