Legal Opinion

United States v. Portt

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided February 10, 1984No. ACM S26161PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The issue before us involves a search of a wall locker by members of the security police squadron who had been detailed to clean the guardmount room. The accused contends that this evidence and that later discovered, together with the subsequent incriminating statements made by him, were the results of an unlawful search by individuals acting in a governmental capacity who had neither a search authorization nor a valid consent. Mil.R.Evid. 311, 314, and 315. We disagree and affirm.

I

There is no dispute as to the facts. During the early morning hours of 8 May 1983,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. VolanteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. MorrisonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. WeissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. United States v. RoganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. Billy Gene Maxwell and Robert Dale MobleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. PorttUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. HodgesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API