Legal Opinion

United States v. Brandell

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 25, 1992No. 67,242; NMCM 89 2045PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of 26 specifications of dishonorable failure to maintain sufficient funds for payment of checks, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934, and other offenses not at issue before this Court. The approved * sentence provides for a bad-conduct dis*370charge, confinement for 24 months, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence. 33 MJ 723 (1991).

We granted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. James E. Little, United States of America v. I. L. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. FontenotUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. McLemoreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. DababnehU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. BrandellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. DatzCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  2. United States v. SchlamerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  3. United States v. ToyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  4. United States v. WoodardU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. United States v. FittenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API