Legal Opinion
Rackley v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 26, 2002No. 99 CIV. 5813(JES)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Luther Raekley (“plaintiff’ or “Mr. Raekley”) brings the above-captioned action against the City of New York (“the City”) and individual City employees (collectively, “the City Defendants”), and New York City Marshal George Airday (“defendant Airday”). 1 Plaintiff alleges that he is entitled to relief because the procedures the City uses to enter judgments for unpaid parking tickets and subsequently to seize street-parked cars pursuant to such judgments (“the Seizure Process” or “the Process”) — as implemented by both the New York…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Vaher v. Town of OrangetownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Iwachiw v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Dubin v. County of NassauDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- DeFalco v. DeChanceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Pflaum v. Town of StuyvesantDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.