Legal Opinion
Tate v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 17, 2010No. 09-7034PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON.
KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:
Christine A. Tate appeals the district court’s summary judgment on each of her four constitutional and five common-law tort claims arising from the 2002 impoundment and sale of her automobile by the District of Columbia (District or D.C.) resulting from her unpaid traffic fines and related fees. Tate v. District of Columbia, 601 F.Supp.2d 132 (D.D.C.2009). For the reasons set out below, we affirm the judgment on her constitutional claims and remand her D.C. common law claims, which the district court…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Elkins v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Sanchez v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Ali v. TolbertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Dixon v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Mateos-Sandoval v. County of SonomaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.