Legal Opinion
Walls v. Decatur Fertilizer Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 16, 1926No. 8 Div. 861PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
This is the second appeal in this cause; former decision, Decatur Fertilizer Co. v. Walls, 212 Ala. 226, 102 So. 32.
Plea A on former appeal alleges:
“The product shipped was worthless and had no value as a fertilizer.”
Plea 2 of the present record alleges:
“ * * * That the consideration for said note has failed in this, the note was given for commercial fertilizer manufactured by plaintiff and sold to defendant as suitable for raising crops, and defendant avers that said' fertilizer was worthless for the purpose for which it was manufactured and sold.”
This is admittedly a plea of failure of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pilgreen v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- O'Donnell v. RodigerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Wadsworth v. DunnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Doe ex dem. Gosson v. LaddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Barfield v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Strickland v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Thomas v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. v. WeemsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Birmingham Baptist Hospital v. BrantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.