Legal Opinion
Lopinsky v. Hertz Drive-Ur-Self Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 10, 1951No. 98, Docket 22156PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER'CURIAM.
The appellant initiated the present action dm the District Uotint fer the Southern District of New York against the Hertz Drive-Ur-Self System, Inc. (hereinafter called “Hertz”), Edward J. O’Brien, and Charles A. Harrison administrator of the estate of Walter Benedict Baer. Briefly, the complaint alleges that the plaintiff’s intestate was killed on May 29, 1950, in an automobile collision on Route 22 in the State of New York;, that the automobile which caused the death of the deceased was operated by Walter Benedict Baer, was owned by the defendant Edward J. O’Brien, and was rented…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Echeverry v. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
3Cited by38 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Telechron, Inc. v. ParissiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Bendix Aviation Corp. v. GlassCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Rieser v. Baltimore Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.