Dias v. City and County of Denver
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
We consider a constitutional challenge to a Denver city ordinance banning a category of dogs commonly known as “pit bulls.” 1 Sonya Dias, Hilary Engel, and Sheryl White allege that the pit bull ban violates the Fourteenth Amendment because it: (1) is unconstitutionally vague on its face; and (2) deprives them of substantive due process. Before the plaintiffs had any opportunity to present evidence to support their claims, the district court dismissed both claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). On appeal, the plaintiffs argue that the district court erred…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by472 opinions
- Brown v. BuhmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Halley v. HuckabyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Leverington v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Chamber of Commerce of United States v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
467 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.