Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIsrael Rubin, J.
By order of Mr. Justice Helman dated March 1, 1976, a trial has ben directed on the preliminary issue of whether the plaintiff has complied with the require*383ments of subdivision (b) of section 608 of the Insurance Law that the alleged "hit and run” accident was reported to the police within 24 hours or as soon as reasonably possible following the occurrence.
The plaintiff was struck by an automobile on December 14, 1972 at approximately 8:30 a.m. as he was crossing Utica Avenue in Brooklyn, New York. It is alleged that the vehicle fled the scene of the occurrence without stopping and that there…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- In re the Arbitration between Taub & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- In re the Arbitration between Phelan & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- In re the Arbitration between Davis & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gunter v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- In re the Arbitration between Country Wide Insurance & RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Hatcher v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- In re DanielCivil Court of the City of New York · 1999
- Gunter v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.