Legal Opinion
In re Daniel
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided August 12, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Paul A. Victor, J.
In this proceeding the petitioner Kenneth Daniel seeks an *943order, pursuant to article 52 of the Insurance Law, permitting him to bring an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (hereinafter MVAIC).
At the hearing conducted before this court respondent conceded that petitioner was injured as a result of an accident involving a hit-and-run motorist and that petitioner is otherwise “qualified”, within the meaning of the Insurance Law, to bring an action against MVAIC. However, respondent argued that petitioner should be precluded…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Hauswirth v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Arbitration between Taub & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- People v. BrisottiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1996
- Amtorg Trading Corp. v. Broadway & 56th Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.