Legal Opinion

Hix v. Cassetty

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Prewitt

This is a workmen’s compensation case. Defendants have appealed, contesting* only the amount of the recovery.

The Chancellor found that complainant was permanently and totally disabled; that his average weekly wage-was $20.25; that defendants have paid complainant’s medical and hospital bills amounting to $538, or $38 in excess of the $500 fixed by statute; that defendants have also paid complainant compensation, after deducting $73 paid him for the time he worked, the sum of $234, making a total credit of $272; and that 60 per cent of complainant’s weekly wage would be $12.15.

The Chancellor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kingsport Silk Mills v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Central Surety & Insurance v. Mrs. Cora Trawick CourtTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Russell v. Virginia Bridge & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Phillips v. Diamond Coal Mining Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Plumlee v. Maryland CasualtyTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shores v. ShoresTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Johnson v. AndersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. New Jellico Coal Co. v. GilburthTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. J. M. Gallagher Co. v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Adams Const. Co. v. CantrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API