Legal Opinion

New Jellico Coal Co. v. Gilburth

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice TomliNSON

The sole question presented by this appeal is the legal effect under our Workmen’s Compensation Law, Williams’ Code sec. 6851 et seq., of certain stipulated facts.

Mr. Gilburth received a leg injury in the course of and growing out of Ms employment by the New Jellico Coal Company. There was no physical loss of any part of this leg, but there is a permanent loss of 25% of its use. This partial permanent loss of use has not decreased Gilburth’s earning capacity. He has returned to the work he was doing at the time he was injured, and is receiving the same rate of pay. He has been paid as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sun Coal Co. v. EppersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hix v. CassettyTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Huggins v. B. C. Jarrell & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Crane Enamelware Co. v. CrawleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Tennessee Products Corp. v. AttertonTennessee Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aerosol Corporation of the South v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hedges Manufacturing Co. v. WorleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Rose v. City of BristolTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Standard Glass Co. v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Southern Mfg. Co. v. WadeTennessee Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API