Legal Opinion

Newberry v. Youngs

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1956No. 34088PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is a compensation case in which plaintiff ap peals and defendant cross-appeals. The appeal presents two questions:

Was the plaintiff’s contract of hire such as to cause compensation to be calculated on the formula prescribed by section 48-126, R. S. Supp., 1955, for a continuous employment relationship? The trial court held that it was, and we affirm that holding.

Was the plaintiff entitled to recover the reasonable cost of transportation from his home to the doctor’s office and to the hospital for medical care and treatment? The trial court denied the claim. We find it to be an allowable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  2. Scruggs Bros. & Bill Garage v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Huhn v. Foley Bros. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. Romig v. Champion Blower & Forge Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Davis v. Lincoln CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Spiker v. John Day Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pavel v. Hughes Brothers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Armstrong v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Mobley v. Jack & Son PlumbingSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  5. Ney v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API