Legal Opinion

Mobley v. Jack & Son Plumbing

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 4, 1964No. 33118, 33170PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

170 So.2d 41 (1964)

Russell MOBLEY, Petitioner,

v.

JACK & SON PLUMBING and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

Jacob and Antonet MILAVIC (Jack & Son Plumbing) and American Fire and Casualty Company, Cross-Petitioners,

v.

Russell MOBLEY and Florida Industrial Commission, Cross-Respondents.

Nos. 33118, 33170.

Supreme Court of Florida.

November 4, 1964.

Rehearing Denied December 18, 1964.

Samuel Sheradsky, Miami, for petitioner and cross-respondent.

Edwin H. Underwood, Jr., Gerald T. Nolan and Wakefield & Underwood, Miami, for cross-petitioners and respondents.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. US Casualty Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Arkin Construction Company v. SimpkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Ball v. MannSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. Scruggs Bros. & Bill Garage v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Huhn v. Foley Bros. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Breitenbach v. N.B. Handy Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Malu v. SECURITY NAT. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. Hunter v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. S & S Stove Repair, Inc. v. DumasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Getson v. WM BANCORPCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API