Legal Opinion

Cody & Edgar v. Automobile Financing Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 21, 1927No. 18162PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Where the parties to a sale of an automobile enter into a written contract with respect thereto in which the property is described as one “Nash Touring car, 5 passenger, Model 691, serial No. 239131, motor No. 126524,” and in which it is stipulated that “the vendor does not warrant said property, and make no representations concerning same except that the title to same is in the vendor and free from encumbrance,” such stipulation amounts to a refusal by the vendor to warrant the property except as to title; and where it is not shown that the seller practiced any fraud on the purchaser…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rounsaville & Brother v. Leonard Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Hoffman v. Franklin Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Widincamp v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Snellgrove v. DingelhoefCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  5. Angier v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frick Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Seigler v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Wilson v. EargleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  5. Sumner v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API