Legal Opinion

Seigler v. Barrow

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1951No. 33284PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Worrill, Judge.

J. B. Barrow and O. L. King, trading under the name and style of King-Barrow Company foreclosed a conditional-sale contract against Joseph W. Seigler, and, under the power granted in the said contract, sold certain refrigerating equipment. Thereafter they instituted this action for a deficiency judgment. On the trial the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff, leaving to the jury the sole question as to the amount of attorney’s fees to be assessed against the defendant. The defendant made a motion for a new trial on the general grounds and added by way of amendment two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Widincamp v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Cody & Edgar v. Automobile Financing Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Douglas v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hall v. Everett Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  2. Dr. Pepper Finance Corp. v. CooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. UNITED STATES LEASING CORPORATION v. Jones Pharmacy, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Wilson v. EargleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API