Legal Opinion

Thomas Garner and Cammi Garner v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 19, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00378Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION THOMAS GARNER and CAMMI GARNER, Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. Case No. 2:24-cv-00378-TC-DAO THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE Judge Tena Campbell COMPANY, Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Defendant. Before the court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant The Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati Insurance). (ECF No. 45.) For the reasons stated below, the court denies the motion. BACKGROUND This insurance dispute arises from a car accident that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Birch v. Polaris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. Sawyers v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  5. Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API