Legal Opinion

Dornick Et Ux. v. Wierton C. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1933No. Appeal 97PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

This action is. to recover damages for the death of appellees’ son, seven years of age, caused by his falling into a reservoir on July 12, 1930, and drowning. The reservoir, 78 feet in diameter, is located on the side of a hill, and is owned and used by defendant. It is surrounded by a concrete wall, varying in height above the ground from a few inches to several feet. Immediately outside of, and extending 3 to 4 feet above, the concrete, is a barbed wire fence, with 5 to 9- -wires', depending- on the height - of the wall above the ground, attached to posts 7 feet 4…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. PenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Thompson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Gillespie v. McGowanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Millum v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Rodgers v. LeesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Cooper v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Pietros Et Ux. v. Hecla C. C. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Murdock Et Ux. v. Pa. Railroad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Dolena v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API