Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Ludwig
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 1907No. Civ. No. 353PublishedCited by 8 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Bartlett, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Plaintiff, as administrator, brought the action for the recovery of $5,170, claiming that it belongs to said estate, and that the defendant unlawfully collected and embezzled said amount after the death of said George Ludwig. The defense is that the money was given to defendant by the said George Ludwig sometime previous to his death. The issue is squarely presented by the pleadings, as follows: The complaint alleges:
“That thereafter, to wit, January 29th, 1903, the said George Ludwig, without any consideration therefor and for the purpose that the said indebtedness due to him from the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Basket v. HassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Telford v. PattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Denigan v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ruiz v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Knight v. TrippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Francoeur v. BeattyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Estate of WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Estate of Loewenstein v. KuchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Hawthorne v. Austin Organ Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Knox v. KearneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.