Legal Opinion

Gause v. Peeler

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHERICK, PJ.

These are the essential averments of the petition that need be considered in the matter, and present the question whether or not the trial court properly sustained a demurrer to this petition. It appears that the court sustained this demurrer upon the authority of the case of Smith v Commissioners of Williams County, 10 C.C. (n.s.), 115, 19 C.D., 610, and also upon the authority of Burrell, Admr v Ohio Trartion Co., 7 N.P. (n.s.), 136, 19 O.D. (N.P.). 112. It will be noted that in both of these cases the county commissioners in their official capacity were the defendants, and we…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bales v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Washington Township v. RappOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API