Washington Township v. Rapp
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By KLINGER, J.
The plaintiff can recover only under the facts pleaded under the doctrine of respondeat superior; and under the common law this dpctrine was not available as against a political subdivision, such as the defendant in this action.
Dunn v Agricultural Society, 46 Oh St, 93;
38 Cyc., 640;
1 L.R.A., 754.
So that, if the plaintiff can recover from the township, it must be by virtue of §3298-17, GC. Since this statute is in derogation of the common law, it must be strictly construed.
Board of Commissioners v Transfer & Storage Co., 75 Oh St, 244;
Ebert v Commissioners, 75 Oh St, 474;
Le…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gause v. PeelerOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hook v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- Forbis v. Springfield Township TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Gutridge v. Suburban Steel Supply Co., 2007 Ca 00110 (7-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008