Legal Opinion

Bales v. Board of County Commissioners

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.

This is a proceeding in error from the court of common pleas of Cuyahoga county, wherein an objection was made to any evidence under the petition on the ground that the allegations thereof were not sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and thereupon judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants, the Board of County Commissioners et al. Upon hearing of a motion for a new trial the same was refused.

The issue involves the construction of Section 2408 of the General Code of Ohio, which reads:

“The Board of County Commissioners may * * * be sued * * * in any court of judicature, * * * and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rush v. FrenchArizona Supreme Court · 1874
  2. McMahon v. . Second Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. City of Philadelphia v. Hestonville, Mantua & Fairmount Passenger RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. In re WoodruffDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1899
  5. Whitney v. NiehausOhio Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ditmyer v. Board of County Commissioners of Lucas CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pancake v. WakefieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Starling v. Bd. of Commrs. of Portage CountyOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Covent Insurance v. Carroll County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Gabris v. BlakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API