Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

885 Park Avenue Brooklyn, LLC v. Goddard

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 10, 2017Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSolomon, J.

(dissenting in part and concurring in part and voting to dismiss the appeals from the orders dated March 13, 2013 and August 28, 2013, reverse the final judgment, vacate the order granting landlord’s motion for summary judgment *79and denying tenant’s cross motion to compel discovery, deny landlord’s motion for summary judgment and grant tenant’s cross motion to compel discovery in the following memorandum). While I concur in the dismissal of the intermediate orders, I would reverse the final judgment. However well researched and reasoned the decision on the motion for summary judgment may be,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Detko v. McDonald's Restaurants of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Sutter v. Wakefern Food Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Rose v. La JouxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Vinar v. LitmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API